A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure

Back
  • A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure   by coinsarefun on 13 Nov, 2009 12:09
  • 1944-P MS65 PCGS

    1944-D MS65 PCGS

    1944-S MS66 PCGS
















       
  • Reply #1   by walmann on 13 Nov, 2009 15:39
  • Looks like some strike doubling on the reverse of the Philly.

    Attractive coins.
  • Reply #2   by LotsoLuck on 13 Nov, 2009 18:52
  • Those have a bit of the wow factor eh?
  • Reply #3   by FilthyBroke on 13 Nov, 2009 19:32
  • Neat coins!  Your pics?  They look great! :) 

    What is going on under the first "A" in America on the '44 P?
  • Reply #4   by coinsarefun on 13 Nov, 2009 19:59
  • Neat coins!  Your pics?  They look great! :) 

    What is going on under the first "A" in America on the '44 P?




    I wish they were my pic's :) They are part of a huge batch I sent to Mark Goodman............
    .............he's da' man :ThumbsUp;


    I think what people are seeing on the 44P is shadows or something :HMMMMM;
  • Reply #5   by FilthyBroke on 13 Nov, 2009 20:17
  • I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.
  • Reply #6   by coinsarefun on 13 Nov, 2009 20:19
  • I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.




    Could be toning also?
  • Reply #7   by FilthyBroke on 13 Nov, 2009 20:28
  • I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.




    Could be toning also?

    I'm not sure we're looking at the same thing. :)  This is what caught my eye-
  • Reply #8   by coinsarefun on 13 Nov, 2009 20:50
  • I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.




    Could be toning also?

    I'm not sure we're looking at the same thing. :)  This is what caught my eye-






    Hmmmm, now you have me wondering. I will ask Mark for a really big image and maybe a
    close up :HMMMMM;
  • Reply #9   by coinsarefun on 15 Nov, 2009 13:42
  • I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.







    Mark Goodman did a closeup of that area.........kinda neat ;D
    Looks like a diebreak :HMMMMM;









    Could be toning also?

    I'm not sure we're looking at the same thing. :)  This is what caught my eye-






    Hmmmm, now you have me wondering. I will ask Mark for a really big image and maybe a
    close up :HMMMMM;

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Are you sure?

Go to page:
You're not logged in

Navigation