Author Topic: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure  (Read 2705 times)

Offline coinsarefun

  • Administrator
  • Master Collector
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
  • Karma +5/-0
A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« on: November 13, 2009, 12:09:25 PM »
1944-P MS65 PCGS

1944-D MS65 PCGS

1944-S MS66 PCGS
















   



Offline walmann

  • Full Collector
  • ***
  • Posts: 211
  • Karma +1/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2009, 03:39:09 PM »
Looks like some strike doubling on the reverse of the Philly.

Attractive coins.
Interested in world coins 1912,1917,1936,1937,1951,1960,1988,2008,2009

Offline LotsoLuck

  • Learning The Ropes
  • *
  • Posts: 33
  • Karma +0/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #2 on: November 13, 2009, 06:52:56 PM »
Those have a bit of the wow factor eh?

Offline FilthyBroke

  • Expert Collector
  • *
  • Posts: 698
  • Karma +1/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #3 on: November 13, 2009, 07:32:55 PM »
Neat coins!  Your pics?  They look great! :) 

What is going on under the first "A" in America on the '44 P?
please visit my website - http://jetoncollector.com/index.html

Offline coinsarefun

  • Administrator
  • Master Collector
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
  • Karma +5/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #4 on: November 13, 2009, 07:59:33 PM »
Neat coins!  Your pics?  They look great! :) 

What is going on under the first "A" in America on the '44 P?




I wish they were my pic's :) They are part of a huge batch I sent to Mark Goodman............
.............he's da' man :ThumbsUp;


I think what people are seeing on the 44P is shadows or something :HMMMMM;

Offline FilthyBroke

  • Expert Collector
  • *
  • Posts: 698
  • Karma +1/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #5 on: November 13, 2009, 08:17:03 PM »
I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.
please visit my website - http://jetoncollector.com/index.html

Offline coinsarefun

  • Administrator
  • Master Collector
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
  • Karma +5/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #6 on: November 13, 2009, 08:19:05 PM »
I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.




Could be toning also?

Offline FilthyBroke

  • Expert Collector
  • *
  • Posts: 698
  • Karma +1/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #7 on: November 13, 2009, 08:28:09 PM »
I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.




Could be toning also?

I'm not sure we're looking at the same thing. :)  This is what caught my eye-
please visit my website - http://jetoncollector.com/index.html

Offline coinsarefun

  • Administrator
  • Master Collector
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
  • Karma +5/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #8 on: November 13, 2009, 08:50:30 PM »
I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.




Could be toning also?

I'm not sure we're looking at the same thing. :)  This is what caught my eye-






Hmmmm, now you have me wondering. I will ask Mark for a really big image and maybe a
close up :HMMMMM;

Offline coinsarefun

  • Administrator
  • Master Collector
  • *****
  • Posts: 1918
  • Karma +5/-0
Re: A trio of 1944 Walkers for your viewing pleasure
« Reply #9 on: November 15, 2009, 01:42:19 PM »
I was thinking lamination or planchet defect.  That's what I love about macro photography - studying the details of the surface and the design intricasies.







Mark Goodman did a closeup of that area.........kinda neat ;D
Looks like a diebreak :HMMMMM;









Could be toning also?

I'm not sure we're looking at the same thing. :)  This is what caught my eye-






Hmmmm, now you have me wondering. I will ask Mark for a really big image and maybe a
close up :HMMMMM;